还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

Newspaper editorial:
 
In an attempt to reduce the crime rate, the governor is getting tough on criminals and making prison conditions harsher.  Part of this effort has been to deny inmates the access they formerly had to college-level courses.  However, this action is clearly counter to the governor's ultimate goal, since after being released form prison, inmates who had taken such courses committed far fewer crimes overall than other inmates.
 
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

选项:

A、Not being able to take college-level courses while in prison is unlikely to deter anyone from a crime that he or she might otherwise have committed.
B、Former inmates are no more likely to commit crimes than are members of the general population.
C、The group of inmates who chose to take college-level courses were not already less likely than other inmates to commit crimes after being released.
D、Taking high school level courses in prison has less effect on an inmate's subsequent behavior than taking college-level courses does.
E、The governor's ultimate goal actually is to gain popularity by convincing people that something effective is being done about crime.

答案:

C

提问:

我感觉全都是错的。C为什么是assumption?原文的argument到底是什么?是与目标背道而驰,还是读书导致犯罪率低。如果说原文的argument是读书犯罪率低,那C选项:“读书犯罪率高是读书犯罪率低的假设?”

解答:

点赞0
阅读6202
解答: 张慧雯

提问:

我感觉全都是错的。C为什么是assumption?原文的argument到底是什么?是与目标背道而驰,还是读书导致犯罪率低。如果说原文的argument是读书犯罪率低,那C选项:“读书犯罪率高是读书犯罪率低的假设?”

解答:

点赞0
阅读6203
解答: 张慧雯老师

提问:

这题A选项有点看不懂。考场上遇到这种一堆否定词的怎么快速理解?

解答:

点赞1
阅读6517
解答: 唐瑭老师

提问:

请Tina老师解答一下,原文的逻辑链是说在监狱上过课程的人犯罪少,所以不让上课不能降低犯罪率。A选项说不上课就不能阻止人犯罪,这个逻辑上有什么问题?

解答:

点赞0
阅读8695
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

提不出这题的逻辑......

解答:

点赞1
阅读8742
解答: 胡凡老师

提问:

抱歉老师我都不记得这道题我有没有问过。我先我我在这里。这道题C压根就没想选, 原文不是说为了打击犯罪,政府开始剥夺犯人权利包括读书这件事。作者指出这其实也违背了政府减少犯罪率的初衷 因为犯人学历高的话出来再犯事概率就小了。C不是反过来了么,读书多的也没怎么减少犯罪率……

解答:

点赞0
阅读8719
解答: 郭培月老师

提问:

A说不能上大学不太可能会阻止那些人犯罪。如果用取非的话应该变成上了大学就能阻止? 还是不上大学能阻止? 还是上大学不能阻止? 做的时候取非成不上大学能阻止感觉是削弱。 但是如果是上了大学就能阻止就变成加强了。

解答:

点赞0
阅读8700
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

看了老英的解释, 觉得对A 的解释有不同的想法: 老英说的是 “A说不能拿到一个大学学位不太可能推迟一个人已经犯的错,原文谈的是学位高低和将来犯罪率的关系,可是这个选项谈的却是对已经犯的罪产生的影响,无关,杀。” 但是我觉得A选项的意思是: 在监狱里可不可以修大学课程不太可能威慑监狱外面有可能犯罪的人。 这选项没提到已经犯的罪呀? A 选项说的就是这个政府的policy 不太可能阻止外面的人犯罪因此对crime rate 的降低没啥作用。 这个理解为啥不对呢?

解答:

点赞-1
阅读8718
解答: sysadmin老师

提问:

做题时留下了AC。A讲的就是参不参加大学课程和犯不犯罪的问题,感觉和原文能连上。C也是讲的这个问题。感觉两个都能留学,最后不知道怎么选,蒙了A

解答:

点赞0
阅读8719
解答: sysadmin老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询