还没有登录哦！
[Critical Reasoning]
试题详情
题目：
Of patients over 65 years old who survived coronary bypass surgery—a procedure widely prescribed for people with heart disease—only 75 percent benefited from the surgery. Thus it appears that for one in four such patients, the doctors who advised them to undergo this surgery, with its attendant risks and expense, were more interested in an opportunity to practice their skills and in their fee than in helping the patient.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument?
⼼选项:
A、Many of the patients who receive coronary bypass surgery are less than 55 years old.
B、Possible benefits of coronary bypass surgery include both relief from troubling symptoms and prolongation of life.
C、Most of the patients in the survey decided to undergo coronary bypass surgery because they were advised that the surgery would reduce their risk of future heart attacks.
D、The patients over 65 years old who did not benefit from the coronary bypass surgery were as fully informed as those who did benefit from the surgery as to the risks of the surgery prior to undergoing it.
E、The patients who underwent coronary bypass surgery but who did not benefit from it were medically indistinguishable, prior to their surgery, from the patients who did benefit.
答案:
E
提问：
请唐老师解答一下, 谢谢. 题干的观点是医生, 同帮助病人相比, 医生对机会与钱更感兴趣. 没一个选项提到同医生的兴趣相关的信息, 都是在谈病人和病人的收益, 很难做抉择; 只有D和E中涉及到了比较. 这题完全没概念...
解答：
点赞0
阅读1196
提问：
请唐老师解答一下, 谢谢. 题干的观点是医生, 同帮助病人相比, 医生对机会与钱更感兴趣. 没一个选项提到同医生的兴趣相关的信息, 都是在谈病人和病人的收益, 很难做抉择; 只有D和E中涉及到了比较. 这题完全没概念...
解答：
点赞0
阅读1197
提问：
选了D。觉得D说告知信息一样就削弱了原文最后一句话
解答：
点赞0
阅读1755
提问：
我选了D
读原文后 原文是在说65岁以上有75%的人得益处 医生让他们接受手术是因为想得到练习还有费用的好处 不是想帮助他们 我会觉得原文在问 竟然只有那么些人可得益处 为什么医生还要叫他们做手术？
B回答说 因为手术还有其它好处
D回答说 65岁的人没得好处的在手术前已被告知风险
E回答说 接受手术不得好处的人在手术前接受的药物与得益处的人是一样的
我对于说的是同一件事还是不是很了解 就得他们都有回应原文 特别是B 但想不通E怎么说的是一回事 手术前接受的药物一不一样 跟医生要病人做手术的原因 是一回事吗
解答：
点赞1
阅读1811
问个问题
注册太麻烦？点这里查看免费答疑吧！
博币不足
加"GMAT小百科"小智微信
直接送200
