还没有登录哦!

[Sentence Correction]

试题详情

题目:

The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.

选项:

A、The nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.To the historian Tacitus,the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote two letters, being the only eyewitness accounts of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
B、The only eyewitness account is in two letters by the nephew of Pliny the Elder writing to the historian Tacitus an account of the great eruption of Vesuvius.
C、Writing the only eyewitness account,Pliny the Elder's nephew accounted for the great eruption of Vesuvius in two letters to the historian Tacitus.
D、In two letters to the historian Tacitus,the nephew of Pliny the Elder wrote the only eyewitness account of the great eruption of Vesuvius

答案:

E

提问:

请问金栩竹老师这道题怎么选呢?我选了B

解答:

点赞0
阅读3724
解答: 金栩竹

提问:

请问金栩竹老师这道题怎么选呢?我选了B

解答:

点赞0
阅读3725
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

您好,这道题目想要请王文静老师来回答一下,我是之前广州班的学生,我选的A,听了解析之后还是不太懂,这个题目我当时在A和E中徘徊知道这个就是在考修饰,当时确实感觉这个in two letters这个离这个wrote有一点远,但是读了好几遍之后感觉没有什么歧义,听了之前的语音之后还是不明白这个歧义的点在哪里,一种理解就是正常的理解,另外一种有歧义的理解方式就是说把in two letters紧贴着修饰这个维苏威火山,可是这个我还是不能理解,这个火山就是一个自然事物很明显不可能跑到信里去,我感觉没有人会这么想吧,就是希望老师把这个有歧义的地方解释一下翻译成中文,感谢老师的耐心解答!

解答:

点赞0
阅读3835
解答: 王文静老师

提问:

在A和E之间犹豫了很久。。。这两个选项用词完全一样,唯一看出的不同是E把介词短语提前了,为什么这样更好呢? 我实在没看出来语义有什么区别,怎么能看出来有区别呢???

解答:

点赞1
阅读3832
解答: 金栩竹老师

提问:

希望老师讲解一下看到这道题目的思路,完全看大不懂语义。。无从下手

解答:

点赞0
阅读3765
解答: 金栩竹老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询