还没有登录哦!

[Critical Reasoning]

试题详情

题目:

A moderately large city is redesigning its central downtown area and is considering a plan that would reduce the number of lanes for automobiles and trucks and increase those for bicycles and pedestrians. The intent is to attract more workers and shoppers to downtown businesses by making downtown easier to reach and more pleasant to move around in.

Which of the following would, if true, most strongly support the prediction that the plan would achieve its goal?

选项:

A、People who make a habit of walking or bicycling whenever feasible derive significant health benefits from doing so.
B、Most people who prefer to shop at suburban malls instead of downtown urban areas do so because parking is easier and cheaper at the former.
C、In other moderately sized cities where measures were taken to make downtowns more accessible for walkers and cyclists, downtown businesses began to thrive.
D、If the proposed lane restrictions on drivers are rigorously enforced, more people will likely be attracted to downtown businesses than would otherwise be.
E、Most people who own and frequently ride bicycles for recreational purposes live at a significant distance from downtown urban areas.

答案:

C

提问:

想问一下王文静老师,这道题我错了D而杀掉了C。我判断这道题的逻辑链是:减少车道增加人行道让downtown更舒服👉🏻吸引更多的shoppers和workers。我按照结果导向去做,当时就锁定了D,因为D也说吸引更多人。对完答案再复盘的时候,感觉D可能错误在只说了lane restriction,没提增人行道,或者是说这个if rigorously enforced不太对?但还是有的模糊,想让Tina老师再帮忙顺清一下思路。还有就是C我觉得,business began to thrive实现吸引更多人来downtown算不算过度推理呢?

解答:

点赞0
阅读2518
解答: 唐瑭

提问:

想问一下王文静老师,这道题我错了D而杀掉了C。我判断这道题的逻辑链是:减少车道增加人行道让downtown更舒服👉🏻吸引更多的shoppers和workers。我按照结果导向去做,当时就锁定了D,因为D也说吸引更多人。对完答案再复盘的时候,感觉D可能错误在只说了lane restriction,没提增人行道,或者是说这个if rigorously enforced不太对?但还是有的模糊,想让Tina老师再帮忙顺清一下思路。还有就是C我觉得,business began to thrive实现吸引更多人来downtown算不算过度推理呢?

解答:

点赞0
阅读2519
解答: 唐瑭老师

提问:

想请教一下,这题就说“减机动车道曾人行自行车,可提高市区accessible从而增进市区的繁荣”,我错选了D (如果减了车道,很多人就会来市区做生意)我感觉这个选项符合老师上课时说的“支持了逻辑链的一个子集”。。。但是答案是C(其他类似的城市这样做效果不错)这个答案似乎也符合老师上课说的“支持了逻辑链类似的东西”。就不知道如何取舍了。。。其他选项:A讲个人与原文结论无关(算脑补吧)B原文没有涉及parking的事情(本文主义)E我一开始也有点想选,因为那些骑自行车的人都住在郊区,城市里的自行车道多了他们可能更愿意搬进城里,但是后来犹豫了一下感觉跟原文逻辑有点远。 老师我做逻辑比较慢,总想很多,给分析一下吧,谢谢

解答:

点赞-1
阅读2497
解答: haiwang@boost.org.cn老师

问个问题

点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询