[Multi-Source Reasoning]

For each of the following statements, select Inferable if the statement is reasonably inferable from the information provided. Otherwise, select Not Inferable.

[Reading Comprehension]

The author asserts which of the following about Arboria's trade policy?

[Critical Reasoning]

There is no surviving recording of the Duke Ellington Orchestra’s performance of a piece that Ellington wrote for the orchestra late in his career. Two different bands have recently recorded the piece, each claiming to have made an authentic reproduction of the Ellington Orchestra’s performance. One of these two recorded performances, however, is much closer to Ellington’s own handwritten score, and must therefore be the more authentic of the two.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

[Reading Comprehension]

The primary purpose of the passage is to

[Critical Reasoning]

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

[Critical Reasoning]

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

[Critical Reasoning]

A year ago, Dietz Foods launched a yearlong advertising campaign for its canned tuna. Last year Dietz sold 12 million cans of tuna compared to the 10 million sold during the previous year, an increase directly attributable to new customers brought in by the campaign. Profits from the additional sales, however, were substantially less than the cost of the advertising campaign. Clearly, therefore, the campaign did nothing to further Dietz’s economic interests.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

[Critical Reasoning]

A year ago, Dietz Foods launched a yearlong advertising campaign for its canned tuna. Last year Dietz sold 12 million cans of tuna compared to the 10 million sold during the previous year, an increase directly attributable to new customers brought in by the campaign. Profits from the additional sales, however, were substantially less than the cost of the advertising campaign. Clearly, therefore, the campaign did nothing to further Dietz’s economic interests.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

[Critical Reasoning]

A year ago, Dietz Foods launched a yearlong advertising campaign for its canned tuna. Last year Dietz sold 12 million cans of tuna compared to the 10 million sold during the previous year, an increase directly attributable to new customers brought in by the campaign. Profits from the additional sales, however, were substantially less than the cost of the advertising campaign. Clearly, therefore, the campaign did nothing to further Dietz’s economic interests.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

[Critical Reasoning]

Early in the twentieth century, Lake Konfa became very polluted. Recently fish populations have recovered as release of industrial pollutants has declined and the lakes waters have become cleaner. Fears are now being voiced that the planned construction of an oil pipeline across the lake's bottom might revive pollution and cause the fish population to decline again. However, a technology for preventing leaks is being installed. Therefore, provided this technology is effective, the fears are groundless.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?