Critical Reasoning

试题详情

题目:

Although the discount stores in Goreville's central shopping district are expected to close within five years as a result of competition from a SpendLess discount department store that just opened, those locations will not stay vacant for long.  In the five years since the opening of Colson's, a nondiscount department store, a new store has opened at the location of every store in the shopping district that closed because it could not compete with Colson's.
 
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

选项:

A、Many customers of Colson's are expected to do less shopping there than they did before the SpendLess store opened.
B、Increasingly, the stores that have opened in the central shopping district since Colson's opened have been discount stores.
C、At present, the central shopping district has as many stores operating in it as it ever had.
D、Over the course of the next five years, it is expected that Goreville's population will grow at a faster rate than it has for the past several decades.
E、Many stores in the central shopping district sell types of merchandise that are not available at either SpendLess or Colson's.

答案:

B

提问:

第二句话,in the five years since the opening of Colson's 。。。。不明白意思。
评分: 0
浏览: 2075

提问:

转不过弯儿
评分: -1
浏览: 2073

提问:

留下C D 比不出来 最后选了D
评分: 0
浏览: 2057

提问:

请老师再用新的感觉讲讲看,谢谢! 听了新课程以后,对逻辑的相关选项的感觉增加了很多;但是还是会有一些问题,请老管看看: 1,读完原文以后非常模糊,因此再看选项的时候对相信度变化的感觉并不明显; 2,在剩下的选项对比中,还是会下意识的用性质对比的方法来看;
评分: 0
浏览: 2095

提问:

文章讲在一地儿,打折店要关张因为S店刚开,但是这些地儿不会空着,又因为C一个不打折店开张,有个打折店竞争不过C就在购物区那些倒闭的店那儿开张了 原文有点儿乱,屡不清逻辑关系就直接看选项 问哪个驳斥 A 顾客买东西多少,无关 B 在购物区开的店都是什么样的店,不能确定肯定无关,留着 C 开店数量多少,好像沾点儿 D 这个地方人口增长快慢的问题,无关 E 商店卖商品在哪儿有没有,无关 就剩B和C有点关系,觉得文章提过好多点要关,又说店位不会空着,C相对而言更直接就选了C B为什么比C好不明白
评分: 0
浏览: 2114
点我领取
免费专项课程
在线咨询